Criminal Cases Review Commission
In light of the CCRC’s decision not to refer my case to the Court of Appeal, I have been advised to take the matter to the European Court of Human Rights. I shall be doing that in early course.
The CCRC has received a lot of bad publicity since its inception in 1997 and I have resisted joining the exposition for a number of reasons. There comes a time where one has to speak out and that time will be in the form of my next book. I have plenty of material. I asked the CCRC to assess the judge’s comments about a very strong defence witness. He had told the jury that this particular witness may have had a reason for giving such evidence and in effect told them to be cautious when considering what she had said. The reality was that she told the truth and there was absolutely no evidence to suggest otherwise. The CCRC said that the judge had not been prejudicial because he had merely ‘told the jury to look at all witnesses from all angles.’ What the judge said could never be interpreted as this and the CCRC is obviously wrong in its assertion here. A further reality is that there was evidence that Millburn’s (the Sgt who gave evidence against me) evidence was unreliable. She had different accounts of events, her pocket book strongly suggested that there never were repeated kicks (as she said in her oral evidence) and she wrote of a rather strange encounter with my assailant in the cells that does not feature on the custody record (in fact he was fast asleep in his bed at the time). I could go on, but I’ll save it all for The Dark Side. I intend to challenge the CCRC and what they stand for at the very highest political level. I have unanimous support from you, the public, and this gives me an extraordinary position of power, something that I am priviledged to have.
I’ll keep you posted. Thank you all.
Mick.